<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPad, uPad: Apple meets the push-up bra</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.begtodiffer.com/2010/01/ipad-br/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.begtodiffer.com/2010/01/ipad-br/</link>
	<description>Branding for humans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:14:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Van Staalduinen</title>
		<link>http://www.begtodiffer.com/2010/01/ipad-br/comment-page-1/#comment-30905</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Van Staalduinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.begtodiffer.com/?p=2033#comment-30905</guid>
		<description>Yes indeed. I focused on the name in this post. But I totally agree that  the &quot;magical and revolutionary&quot; positioning is discordant with the Apple brand promise. &quot;Just makes sense&quot;; &quot;simple and straightforward&quot;; &quot;built for people&quot; - any of those would ring more true. 

&quot;Magical and Revolutionary&quot; is the type of thing you want people to say *about* you, but it sounds phony coming out of your own mouth.

Back in my &quot;Return of Steve&quot; post last September, an air of mature humility was one of the things I admired about Steve Jobs 3.0 (post iMac). But his people may not have gotten that memo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes indeed. I focused on the name in this post. But I totally agree that  the &#8220;magical and revolutionary&#8221; positioning is discordant with the Apple brand promise. &#8220;Just makes sense&#8221;; &#8220;simple and straightforward&#8221;; &#8220;built for people&#8221; &#8211; any of those would ring more true. </p>
<p>&#8220;Magical and Revolutionary&#8221; is the type of thing you want people to say *about* you, but it sounds phony coming out of your own mouth.</p>
<p>Back in my &#8220;Return of Steve&#8221; post last September, an air of mature humility was one of the things I admired about Steve Jobs 3.0 (post iMac). But his people may not have gotten that memo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey Pennington</title>
		<link>http://www.begtodiffer.com/2010/01/ipad-br/comment-page-1/#comment-30903</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey Pennington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.begtodiffer.com/?p=2033#comment-30903</guid>
		<description>Apple is, well, like you said, Apple. It&#039;s okay for Mac Addicts to feel that way. We&#039;re loyal, and for a good reason: Apple consistently performs remarkably. Apple stuff just works. Apple stuff enables us to be more, well, us. 

What&#039;s not okay is for Apple to start thinking, &quot;Hey, we&#039;re like, you know, Apple, so there!&quot; Where did this unglorious, egotistical, self-aggrandizement come from? &quot;Our best technology…magical and revolutionary…all for an unbelievable price.&quot; Really? THAT&#039;s their focus? On themselves? 

Whenever a company starts sucking up, drinking down their own self-congratulatory press, they&#039;re walking down a dastardly trail. Apple doesn&#039;t need to do the chest-thumping. They can leave that to their fans.

What&#039;s in a name? In this case, the only name that matters is &quot;Apple.&quot; iPad will neither make nor break that product. What&#039;s in an attitude and worldview? Life and death. That&#039;s all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is, well, like you said, Apple. It&#8217;s okay for Mac Addicts to feel that way. We&#8217;re loyal, and for a good reason: Apple consistently performs remarkably. Apple stuff just works. Apple stuff enables us to be more, well, us. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s not okay is for Apple to start thinking, &#8220;Hey, we&#8217;re like, you know, Apple, so there!&#8221; Where did this unglorious, egotistical, self-aggrandizement come from? &#8220;Our best technology…magical and revolutionary…all for an unbelievable price.&#8221; Really? THAT&#8217;s their focus? On themselves? </p>
<p>Whenever a company starts sucking up, drinking down their own self-congratulatory press, they&#8217;re walking down a dastardly trail. Apple doesn&#8217;t need to do the chest-thumping. They can leave that to their fans.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s in a name? In this case, the only name that matters is &#8220;Apple.&#8221; iPad will neither make nor break that product. What&#8217;s in an attitude and worldview? Life and death. That&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
