<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Beg to Differ &#187; Tiger Woods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.begtodiffer.com/tag/tiger-woods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.begtodiffer.com</link>
	<description>Branding for humans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:05:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Out of the Woods? Branding the decade that was.</title>
		<link>http://www.begtodiffer.com/2009/12/woods-decade/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=woods-decade</link>
		<comments>http://www.begtodiffer.com/2009/12/woods-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Van Staalduinen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis & review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Positioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accenture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decade branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gatorade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.begtodiffer.com/?p=1917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what do you call a decade like that one? So far Beg to Differ has resisted the urge to comment on the Tiger Woods scandal. But a friend posted a story on Facebook today that seemed like a great way to wrap up the year, and the decade. Her four-year old asked her out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:right;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-tweetbutton' data-shr_count='none' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.begtodiffer.com%2F2009%2F12%2Fwoods-decade%2F' data-shr_title='Out+of+the+Woods%3F+Branding+the+decade+that+was.'></a><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='standard' data-shr_count='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.begtodiffer.com%2F2009%2F12%2Fwoods-decade%2F' data-shr_title='Out+of+the+Woods%3F+Branding+the+decade+that+was.'></a><a class='shareaholic-fblike' data-shr_layout='standard' data-shr_showfaces='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.begtodiffer.com%2F2009%2F12%2Fwoods-decade%2F' data-shr_title='Out+of+the+Woods%3F+Branding+the+decade+that+was.'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><h3>So what do you call a decade like that one?</h3>
<h4><span style="font-weight: normal;">So far </span>Beg to Differ <span style="font-weight: normal;">has resisted the urge to comment on the <a href="http://web.tigerwoods.com/index" target="_blank">Tiger Woods</a> scandal. But a friend posted a story on <a href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook </a>today that seemed like a great way to wrap up the year, and the decade. Her four-year old asked her out of the blue if he could take down his Tiger Woods poster &#8211; after two years on his wall. When asked why, he said &#8220;it just seems like time.&#8221;  Indeed.</span></h4>
<div id="attachment_1918" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><a href="http://begtodiffer.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Gatorade-with-DIFFER.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1918" title="Gatorade - with DIFFER" src="http://begtodiffer.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Gatorade-with-DIFFER.jpg" alt="As they say: it's hard to see the tree for the Woods with a driver in the rear view mirror: just one of the many brands that have decided not to invite the Tiger into their new decade." width="600" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">As they say: it&#39;s hard to focus on the tree - or the Woods - with a driver in the rear view mirror: just one of the many brands that have decided not to invite the Tiger into their new decade.</p></div>
<h3>The rear-view mirror: out with the old</h3>
<p>The end of the year, or the decade, is of course a great time to reflect, dream, plan, concede defeat, or maybe just take a break from whatever little white ball you were chasing.</p>
<p>But one question burns brighter than any faded Tiger in my mind right now: what do we call the decade that was? Other decades have great names like &#8220;the Dirty Thirties,&#8221; &#8220;The Roaring Twenties,&#8221; or my favourite: &#8220;the Eighties&#8221; (the teenage rugby-pants, new-wave, drama-geek decade doesn&#8217;t need another descriptor &#8211; at least for me).</p>
<h3>A few suggestions for branding the decade just past:</h3>
<h4>The Woods</h4>
<p>Or &#8220;the Woodies&#8221; if you prefer. Oh those halcyon days when the Tiger was young and seemed infallible. Before we learned the awful truth: that he was all too human&#8230; er, actually a major sleaze-ball in his private life. And while that <em>shouldn&#8217;t </em> matter, we learned that when you build a brand empire around yourself, that brand is vulnerable to all the same failings that you are &#8211; particularly if your brand is built on a false perception of super-human purity.</p>
<p>But the thing I like best about &#8220;The Woods&#8221;, is that it implies we&#8217;re out of them now&#8230;</p>
<h4>The Naughties</h4>
<p>Or &#8220;The Naughts&#8221;, &#8220;the aughts&#8221;. Of course &#8220;aught&#8221; or &#8220;naught&#8221; are words for zeroes.  My blog-buddy <a href="http://nancyfriedman.typepad.com/" target="_blank">Nancy Friedman</a> favours &#8220;the Naughties&#8221;. But apart from the Woods, there wasn&#8217;t really that much decade-defining naughtiness when you compare it to the 60&#8242;s, 70&#8242;s, 80&#8242;s, and the &#8220;Bill Clintons&#8221;. Martin Bishop tallied some <a href="http://brandmix.blogspot.com/2009/12/six-of-best-naughties-edition.html" target="_blank">more here</a>, but I&#8217;m not convinced.</p>
<h4>The Zeros</h4>
<p>Or the &#8220;nothings&#8221; Nope. Just too depressing.</p>
<h4>The Ohs</h4>
<p>Not bad. Positive spin on the zeros, with a touch of surprise and wonder, and perhaps a nod of the head to my old <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0366006/" target="_blank">Denim Blues</a> cast-mate <a href="http://http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandra_Oh" target="_blank">Sandra Oh</a> &#8211; but that was the eighties again&#8230;</p>
<h4>The Terror Years</h4>
<p>September 11 2001 cast a massive pall over the decade &#8211; as did the subsequent war-faring, drum-beating, and hysteria.</p>
<h4>The O-amas</h4>
<p>This one has a nice hopeful ring to it: we went from the evil of Osama to the fresh hope represented by (and hopefully fulfilled by) Obama. Time will tell on this one.</p>
<h4>The Bloggies</h4>
<p>Surely the emergence of social media and the democratization of the news cycle &#8211; for better and worse &#8211; is one of the defining themes. Or at least to the millions of us who blog about such things.</p>
<h4>The Happies</h4>
<p>Okay, this may just be for me again. But I have to say that this decade &#8211; whatever we call it &#8211; has been the happiest of my life. I started my <a href="http://www.brandvelope.com" target="_blank">branding business</a> in 2000 and have had the privilege to help many dozens of companies, charities, and government organizations humanize their brands. I also got married to an amazing woman, bought a house, had three incredible kids (the diaper decade?), and started a little blog called Beg  to Differ.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t all sunshine. I made some people angry, and didn&#8217;t always dot all my i&#8217;s or even deliver 100%.  But as I look back, I can&#8217;t help but feel great about the next decade &#8211; whatever we call that.</p>
<p>So as you take down the old posters from your wall, think carefully about what the next decade could become for you, your brand, and your tribe.</p>
<h3>My four-word prescription for the next decade:</h3>
<h2>Keep making it better!</h2>
<h4>Happy New Year!</h4>
<div class="shr-publisher-1917"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.begtodiffer.com/2009/12/woods-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

